Zionism pretends to be Christian will fall now. The question is, what will it be replaced with from a Protestant point of view ? The answer is obvious; Catholicism. We Protestants have fought Zionism aka Jewish supremacy for decades, and a very few Catholics. Now they fall. Than it is safe for both Rome and Orthodox Catholics to stand forward with same many of us Protestants have claimed that Zionism is heresy, as Catholicism is.
I have written about it for 25 years Zionism will fall, because the World have never by God be allowed to live on lies for more than 80 years. Never. The fall will create a vacuum, the Jesuits (Catolic Jews) will need a new One World Religion to control and herd people into a system that they can control people through.
Author Thomas Horn (died 2024) believed it will be the Endtimes battle «Blood on the Altar: The Coming War Between Christian vs. Christian» between Zionists and orthodox Protestants. True, that’s the endtime story, but there line up an even deeper schism, God will have to take down; Protestants vs. Catholics.

I say to Protestant boys; Stay out if all; ‘Why Young White Caucasian Boys Should Steer Clear of Foreign Wars in Favor of Jews in Ukraine & New World Order‘
In this war a father and mother and their children can be on different sides of the Spiritual Battle of the Ages. The war on all of our culture, the ideals of our north european civilization. See here ‘How the Reformation Psychologically Reshaped Western Identity‘
Charlie Kirk promoted knowledge. RCC wouldn’t even allow people to read the Bible for themselves, it had to be interpreted by the Pope, Bishops and Priests, the Clergy, and served to the people and laymen by them.
Than came Gutenberg, an former Catholic who was raised by God to protest the censoring of the Bible, and the Word became FREE !
Then came Martin Luther was also a former Catholic, who saw the REAL Light of the World, not as masonic Lucifer claims he is, in opposition to Jesus.
Norway was Protestant 500y prior to Luther. We teached him Protestantism, not the other way around. Our early viking priests was baptized by Celtic priests in England, not by Romans.
Young people like to herded
All young people like to belong to a social group they regard as successful and big (for protection and self esteem), but that is not Christian. Christian is the opposite. Real Christians have never been in majority anywhere. They had to fight the non-Christians and Catholics (cryptoJewish) always.
The question is, how will Satan control the antiChrist flame in the World, the Luciferian spirit, of course they need to #BuildBackBetter 6build6back6etter. Rebuild what was lost. The control over the youths hearts and minds.
Both Jews and Jesuits was forbidden in Norway in the Protestant constitution.

Psychological Patterns Inherited from the Reformation
1. The Reformation as a Psychological Trait in Western Families
When a person changes religious affiliation, the change is rarely only theological. It usually involves identity restructuring. From a Jungian perspective, religion is not only a doctrinal system but an archetypal structure of the psyche.
Carl Jung viewed religious symbols as expressions of deep psychological patterns that exist within the collective unconscious. These archetypes organize meaning, morality, authority, and identity.
Christian traditions provide symbolic systems through which these archetypes manifest. However, different traditions emphasize different archetypal structures.
In broad terms:
Protestant psychology often emphasizes
- the individual conscience
- personal encounter with Scripture
- direct relationship with God
- inner responsibility for truth
Catholic psychology often emphasizes
- continuity with sacred tradition
- sacred hierarchy and ritual
- sacramental mediation
- historical community
In Jungian language, these two traditions activate different archetypal orientations of the psyche.
In many Protestant traditions, particularly those shaped by the Reformation ethos, the individual believer’s relationship with Scripture and God is emphasized. The principles of sola scriptura, personal conscience, and direct access to Scripture create a psychological framework where individual interpretation and personal conviction are central.
Catholicism, by contrast, places strong emphasis on:
- historical continuity with the Church
- sacramental authority
- hierarchical guidance
- tradition alongside Scripture
When a son raised in a Protestant environment converts to Catholicism, he is not merely adopting new doctrines. He is entering a different epistemological framework—a different way of determining truth.
Psychologically this shift can create tension because the son’s new worldview implicitly rejects the worldview in which he was raised.
Even though the Reformation occurred more than 500 years ago, it created two enduring psychological frameworks of Christianity that still influence families today. In Norway, UK Magna Carta and US Bill of Rights Protestant constitutions, they put emphasis for their nations Governing bodies the control, to protect the INDIVIDUAL. The collectivists view will protect the collective aka «the Church»,or the «State» or the governing bodies from the individual instead, completely opposite spirit in them.
These frameworks are not merely doctrinal differences. They involve deep psychological orientations toward authority, truth, and identity.
In simplified form:
Protestant psychological orientation
- authority of Scripture interpreted personally
- strong emphasis on individual conscience
- suspicion toward centralized religious authority
Catholic psychological orientation
- authority of the Church as historical interpreter
- emphasis on sacramental tradition
- acceptance of institutional spiritual authority
- collectivism
When a person moves from one system to the other, the change is often experienced within families as a shift in psychological allegiance, not only theology.
It is a old saying that «when RCC is in Minority it is like a sheep, when in Majority if becomes the wolf«. The first Jesuit who was actually Jewish acknowledged this.
“No priests or confessors tainted with heresy should be tolerated; and those who have been convicted of it should be immediately stripped of all ecclesiastical revenues; because IT IS BETTER FOR THE FLOCK TO BE WITHOUT A SHEPHERD THAN TO HAVE A WOLF AS SHEPHERD. Shepherds who are certainly Catholic in faith, but who, through their great ignorance and the bad example of their public sins, pervert the people, ought, it seems, to be very severely punished, and deprived of their revenues by their bishops, or at least separated from the care of souls; for it was the bad life and ignorance of these men that brought the plague of heresies into Germany.”
Saint Ignatius of Loyola, Letter to Saint Peter Canisius. August 13, 1554
He is right on this. What he forget to mention is this that Catholics and EO’s hate Sola Scriptura. Because they know they can’t justify these unbiblical beliefs:
- Purgatory
- The papacy
- Relic «veneration»
- Prayers to the dead saints, Mary, and rosary.
- Sinlessness of Mary
- Apostolic succession
- Perpetual virginity of Mary
Praying to anyone else than to Jesus Christ is a total waste of time. That is what Satan wants by this. Get people to pray in a non-effective way. Look at the crime filled, all poor Catolic nations, compare them to north european Protestant nations, what much prayer have helped them be better ? For thinking minds, the answer is obvious.
In many Protestant traditions, particularly those shaped by the Reformation ethos, the individual believer’s relationship with Scripture and God is emphasized. The principles of sola scriptura, personal conscience, and direct access to Scripture create a psychological framework where individual interpretation and personal conviction are central.
Catholicism, by contrast, places strong emphasis on:
- historical continuity with the Church
- sacramental authority
- hierarchical guidance
- tradition alongside Scripture
2. The Father as Spiritual Authority in Protestant Families
In many Protestant traditions, the father historically served as a spiritual guide within the household.
He might:
- lead family prayers
- teach Scripture
- interpret moral questions
- represent religious continuity
This role reflects a core Reformation development: faith moving into the household rather than remaining mediated primarily through the institutional Church.
Therefore, the father’s authority is not only paternal but also spiritually symbolic.
When a child converts to Catholicism from parents Protestantism, this symbolic structure can shift dramatically.
At the time parents notice this, the poison is already planted in the soul of the youth, in their hearts and minds. No knowledge will change it, because it have become an emotional matter they will protect with all kind of arguments.
Satan have found a stronghold in them, and only a death and rebirth of spirit in them will correct it. «The Mystery of Calvary» as the Christian mystic Rudolf Steiner wrote about.
The spirit of father and sons in that moment have taken two different roads, and the rest of their lives they will have completely different «the Way», their spirits will have taken two different paths, the wide and the narrow.
The problem is this will not happen in the blink of an eye, but slowly, slowly… they will follow the meeting and adopt the antithesis of Protestantism, it will be programmed into their emotions, and we can actually see them transform, because in RCC spirit is the hubris that it is the One and Only true Church. A chutzpah no better than Zionism that only Jews are Gods Chosen People. It is the one and the same hubris, and I have lived to and experienced both.
They will not notice themselves, from baby to youth and teenage years, for the the boys their fathers have been their heroes, the fathers will now start see a slow change as the RCC will have taken hold of their hearts and minds. This is not a normal youth rebellion, it is a total change of spirit.
«Those who hold on to the End, will be saved.»
3. Transfer of Spiritual Authority
One of the most subtle aspects of such transitions is subconscious emotional drift.
Because the son’s worldview now frames the Church as the guardian of truth, he may begin to feel that his father lacks something spiritually.
Even if the son deeply loves his father, the mind may unconsciously construct a hierarchy of spiritual understanding.
The son might begin feeling:
- protective of his father’s “misunderstanding”
- frustrated at perceived theological resistance
- inward distance when discussing faith
These emotions are rarely deliberate. They arise from the psychology of worldview alignment.
Catholicism emphasizes the authority of:
- the Church
- apostolic tradition
- priesthood and sacramental structure
- collective «truths» vs. individual truths.
Psychologically, the children may begin orienting thier spiritual life around the Church rather than the household and family. A deep psychological schism have occured.
This creates an unconscious shift:
Before conversion:
father → spiritual authority → interpretation of faith
After conversion:
Church → priest / tradition → interpretation of faith
Even if the child still respects his father deeply, the father may feel that his families Protestant spiritual heredity has been replaced. A whole new alien spirit have taken hold of his childs heart and mind.
This can produce subtle emotional tension.
4. The Father Archetype and Religious Authority
The religious worldview transmitted by a parent often becomes intertwined with the Father archetype.
In a Protestant household where the father reads Scripture, teaches faith, and interprets doctrine, the father unconsciously embodies both:
- the biological father
- the spiritual authority archetype
For the son, the father may represent:
- moral law
- religious truth
- interpretive authority
When the son converts to Catholicism, the symbolic structure changes.
The institutional Church—with its priesthood, apostolic succession, and magisterium—begins to embody the collective Father archetype. If this collective archetype is antiChrist, ALL of their followers will be antiChrist, sublimal.
Psychologically this can produce a subtle displacement:
personal father → symbolic father (Church authority)
This shift may occur without conscious intent.
The son may still love and respect his father, yet his primary spiritual reference authority has moved. From the TRUE father archetype, to the fake social created.
5. Subliminal Social Reinforcement
Humans are profoundly shaped by social belonging.
If the son becomes involved in Catholic intellectual or community life, he begins receiving reinforcement from new peers and mentors.
Psychological reinforcement occurs through:
- community validation
- theological education
- shared narratives about church history
Over time this reinforcement strengthens the son’s identification with the new group.
One consequence of group psychology is in-group / out-group differentiation.
Even if unintentional, the son may begin categorizing perspectives as:
- Catholic understanding (truth / fullness)
- Protestant perspective (partial / mistaken)
This process can slowly influence emotional responses toward his Protestant parents, the faith transmitted to their children represents:
- family legacy
- spiritual responsibility
- conventional continuity
The father will interpret the son’s conversion as a rejection of the family identity. They will feel extreme sadness and grief in this.
6. Identity Reconstruction in Conversion
When a person changes religious affiliation, the change is rarely only theological. It usually involves identity restructuring.
In many Protestant traditions, particularly those shaped by the Reformation ethos, the individual believer’s relationship with Scripture and God is emphasized. The principles of sola scriptura, personal conscience, and direct access to Scripture create a psychological framework where individual interpretation and personal conviction are central.
Conversion often involves a process of identity reconstruction.
The child may reinterpret his past religious upbringing through the lens of his new faith.
When a son raised in a Protestant environment converts to Catholicism, he is not merely adopting new doctrines. He is entering a different epistemological framework—a different way of determining truth.
Psychologically this shift can create tension because the son’s new worldview implicitly critiques the worldview in which he was raised.
Typical reinterpretations may include thoughts such as:
- “My upbringing was sincere but incomplete.”
- “I lacked access to the fullness of tradition.”
- “I understand Christianity more deeply now.”
These thoughts will over time create tension and and hostility toward parents. This happens subtile, over years, and can create an unconscious emotional hierarchy where the child begins viewing his previous framework as less adequate.
Parents may perceive this as rejection, what it is. Their children becomes «Prodigal Sons» and «Prodigal Daughters». On a completely opposite endtimes trejactory than them, what they will feel sad, as they will NOT share eternity than, their spiritual paths separate here and now.
7. The Psychology of Loyalty Conflict
Family psychology often involves what researchers call loyalty conflicts.
The child may feel pulled between two allegiances:
- loyalty to family heritage
- loyalty to new religious convictions
To maintain internal coherence and avoid cognitive dissonance, the psyche tends to align itself strongly with one structure.
If the child believes Catholicism represents the truest expression of Christianity, his inner loyalty may gradually shift toward that framework.
The father, however, may interpret this as disloyalty to family tradition.
Ultimately the conflict between Protestant and Catholic frameworks often reflects two different ways of relating to authority and tradition.
One emphasizes:
- individual conscience
- personal encounter with Scripture
The other emphasizes:
- historical continuity
- communal interpretation
When these systems meet within a family, the tension is not merely doctrinal.
It touches:
- identity
- loyalty
- belonging
- authority
- heritage
8. Cognitive Dissonance in Conversion
The first major psychological mechanism involved is cognitive dissonance.
The son holds two competing mental structures:
-
Inherited loyalty to parents and upbringing
-
New conviction that Catholicism represents deeper or fuller truth
To reduce dissonance, the mind often begins reinterpreting the past.
Common unconscious reinterpretations include:
- “My parents were sincere but misled.”
- “Protestantism is incomplete.”
- “I was missing something growing up.”
This reinterpretation is not usually deliberate hostility. It is a natural psychological process of stabilizing a new identity.
However, from the father’s perspective this may feel like:
- rejection
- betrayal
- dismissal of family heritage
9. Jungian Archetypal Conflict
From a Jungian perspective, religious traditions embody archetypal structures.
White north european Protestantism often expresses the archetype of the individual seeker of truth, standing before God with Scripture.
Latino Catholicism often expresses the archetype of the sacred institutional tradition, representing historical continuity.
Within a family, these archetypal patterns may collide.
The father may unconsciously represent the archetype of the personal spiritual guide, while the Church represents the archetype of the collectivist spiritual authority.
The son’s psyche may gradually realign itself toward the latter.
This shift can feel emotionally destabilizing for both parties.
It is only Satan who crave for a united ALL , illustrated by the inquisition. One World – One Mind – One Heart, all the same. Protestants accept we are all different, and only responsible to our own conscience and our own interpretation of the Word of God, within the Biblical Laws, not Papal authority to interpret them.
Jung emphasized the importance of the shadow—the unconscious aspects of the personality that individuals or groups project onto others.
In religious contexts, the shadow can appear in the form of confessional antagonism.
For example:
Protestants may unconsciously project shadow traits onto Catholicism such as:
- authoritarianism
- ritualism
- superstition
Catholics may project shadow traits onto Protestantism such as:
- fragmentation
- individualism
- doctrinal instability
When these projections occur inside a family relationship, the emotional intensity increases dramatically.
The son may unconsciously perceive the father’s worldview as limited, while the father may perceive the son’s conversion as misguided submission to institutional authority.
Neither side may recognize that part of the conflict involves psychological projection.
10. The Role of Community Reinforcement
Another psychological factor is community reinforcement.
When the child becomes integrated into Catholic intellectual or social networks, he receives affirmation for his new identity.
Community reinforcement often strengthens beliefs through:
- shared narratives
- historical interpretation
- theological education
- social belonging
- psychologial universalism, one of the herd
Over time, this may deepen the son’s conviction that his new position represents historical and theological completeness. This conviction can unintentionally widen emotional distance from family members who remain in a different tradition.
The Transformation of Emotional Loyalty occurs in Jungian terms, as loyalty conflicts to occur when two archetypal structures compete for allegiance.
For the son, the competing structures may be:
- loyalty to father and family heritage
- loyalty to the Church as sacred authority
Because the Church claims apostolic continuity and divine authority, the son may unconsciously feel that ultimate loyalty must align with the Church.
This can gradually influence emotional perception.
Without intending it, the son may begin to reinterpret family traditions as:
- historically incomplete
- spiritually partial
- lacking sacramental fullness
Such reinterpretations are part of the psyche’s attempt to create internal coherence.
11. Subliminal Emotional Drift
One of the most subtle aspects of these dynamics is unconscious emotional drift.
Neither father nor child may consciously intend conflict.
Yet gradual changes may occur in tone and interaction.
Possible signs include:
- avoidance of religious discussion
- quiet disagreement during theological topics
- internal comparison of traditions
- subtle frustration when beliefs clash
Over time these emotional shifts can reshape the relationship totally, both ways.
Slowly, slowly the children taken by RCC hearts and minds will be turned away from their forefathers, even their own fathers and mothers. Every meeting in the abomination of desolation RCC, will program the schism with their Protestant fathers, they had in the youth, just as effective as the TV (Talmud Vision) have done with Zionism for close to 80 years.
The fathers will notice this, both daughters and sons, that from seeing him as their hero, you will notice they not nod in conversation. They might be polite and correct but some grimaces in their faces will show they do not approve the parents statement.
The relationship outward may look superficially the same, but inside the paths have changed, the emotions are changed, the thought processes are changed, different, most often in opposition to each others.
For the rest of their lives they will have to live their lives with pretending everything is all right, outward, but it is completely fake, a false mask they have took on, in the pretense of being polite and civil.
But their spiritual «the Way» (what Christianity first was called, ref. Acts) are completely different.
12. Potential Escalation Patterns
If the situation becomes polarized, several patterns can appear.
Defensive apologetics
Both father and child begin defending their traditions intellectually rather than communicating relationally.
Emotional withdrawal
To avoid conflict, religious topics disappear from conversation entirely.
Identity conflict
The son may feel that fully affirming his new identity requires distancing himself from his former framework.
These dynamics can strain relationships unless consciously addressed.
13. The Mechanism of Moral Reframing
Another important process is moral reframing.
When people convert to a new belief system, they often begin interpreting behaviors and beliefs through the new moral lens.
For example the son may begin to view Protestant positions as:
- historically fragmented
- doctrinally incomplete
- overly individualistic
Even if he respects his parents personally, the system in which they raised him may begin to feel inferior or mistaken.
This can unconsciously influence emotional tone.
The son may not consciously decide to oppose his father, but subtle signals can appear:
- less receptivity to his father’s spiritual guidance
- less willingness to debate Scripture
- emotional withdrawal during religious discussions
14. Paths Toward Psychological Integration
Healthy outcomes often occur when both sides recognize deeper common ground, and both align with their ancestors faiths, and not the one of any clergy and different Popes in Rome.
Possible stabilizing factors include:
Shared Christian foundations
Both traditions affirm:
- belief in Christ
- reverence for Scripture
- pursuit of moral transformation
- the individual to be protected from the collective, not opposite.
Respect for conscience
Acknowledging that sincere believers can arrive at different theological conclusions. This will be difficult for Catolics, since their Church have claimed they are the One and Only from time immemorial.
«The claim that the church is the One and Only is a central tenet of various Christian denominations, particularly the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church. These churches assert that they represent the original church established by Jesus Christ, as outlined in the Nicene Creed, which states that the church is «one, holy, catholic, and apostolic«. (Source)
This will create a theological and psychological supremacism, actually the one and the same we see in Jewish supremacy, that they are «Gods Chosen People» (untrue, ref. John 8:44).
Relational priority
Placing the father–child relationship «our fathers heritage» first.
When the schism exists, theological difference will destroy familial love, it will be colder, kill emotional bonds, they will spiritually proceed two completely different ways, The Narrow Road, and the Wide Road.
15. The Long Historical Echo of the Reformation
Many family tensions between Protestant and Catholic believers today are not merely personal disputes, they are eternal spiritual conflicts of who to dominate the Soul of Man.
Older people have all of them probably lived through this familiar schism created between siblings for decades, some Zionist «christian» (Judaism Light), and others as non-Zionist Christian. Catholic was never an issue for any than in that scenario.
Divide and Conquer. That is the only way the Synagogue of Satan aka ‘Jews’ (John 8:44, Rev. 2:9, 3:9) will have focus away from themselves, to others. Magicians occult trick. Endetimes spiritual war will be christians (allegedly) against Christians, sons against fathers. Then it will be fulfilled what Jesus in Spirit will do;
«For I have come to turn ‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. / A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’» – Matthew 10:35-36
Than must be decided where and in who of them God most probably are, in the father or the son? History and the Bible decide. We can not fight God. All will come true, as written. All false will fall. We need to place our faith on rock, not on sand. #JesusDirect (the One, and Only).
They reflect historical psychological patterns created during the Reformation.
The Reformation introduced a new kind of religious identity centered on:
- personal conscience
- interpretive responsibility
- theological self-definition
This created a culture in North European nations in which individuals often re-evaluate inherited beliefs.
When this occurs inside families, the emotional consequences can be profound.
16. Conclusion
The encounter between Protestant and Catholic identities within a family is not simply a doctrinal disagreement.
It touches deep psychological structures involving:
- authority
- loyalty
- identity
- tradition
- individuation
The child’s conversion may represent a search for deeper spiritual meaning, but end up in Babylon.
The father’s concern may reflect a commitment to inherited truth and family continuity.
Both responses emerge from sincere conviction. And it will break their spiritual bond.
There is just one simple solution to this. That the child have a crucifixion and rebirth of the Babylonian spirit taken hold in them.
Understanding the historical and psychological roots of these dynamics can help families navigate such tensions with greater empathy and wisdom, and secure the children take conscious decision before such drastic measures as converting.
RCC say they built their Church on Peter, who had great faith once, but became a coward denying Christ in face of danger, three times.
“Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump?”
— 1 Corinthians 5:6
Paul means that one sin or false teaching can spread throughout the entire church if it is not stopped. He repeats this in Galatians 5:9.
In the Geneva Bible, the marginal notes (commentary written by the translators) often interpret certain passages that way—especially in the Book of Revelation.
Here are the clearest examples.
1. Revelation 17:4 (most explicit statement)
In the notes on Book of Revelation 17:4, the Geneva Bible commentary says:
“This woman is the Antichrist, that is, the Pope with the whole bodie of his filthie creatures … whose beautie only standeth in outward pompe.”
The note interprets:
The woman riding the beast (Rev 17)
As the papal system in Rome, calling it the Antichrist.
2. Revelation 11:7
A marginal note identifies the beast:
“The Pope, which hath his power out of hell and cometh thence.”
3. Revelation 13:18 (the number 666)
A note explains the number symbolically and connects it with the papacy:
The number can signify “Lateinos / Latin,” referring to the Pope or Antichrist who uses the Latin tongue.”
4. Revelation 14–17 notes (general interpretation)
The marginal notes repeatedly interpret:
Babylon = Rome
The Whore of Babylon = Papal Rome
Antichrist = the papal system.

✅ Important distinction
Bible text: does not name the pope.
Geneva translators’ notes: interpret prophetic symbols (especially in Revelation) as referring to the papacy.
This reflected the belief of many Reformation-era Protestants, such as Martin Luther, John Calvin, and John Knox, who saw the papacy as the Antichrist in prophecy.
✅ Summary
The Geneva Bible identifies the pope as Antichrist mainly in marginal notes, especially:
Revelation 11:7
Revelation 13:18
Revelation 17:3–4 (the clearest statement)
The Abomination of Desolation with Doug Batchelor and Walter Veith (Amazing Facts)

Facebook Comments